مثل اینکه هنوز مجله ـش بیرون نیومده و فقط امتیاز رو گفته که ملت تشویق بشن چند روز دیگه مجله رو بخرن !OPM uk چرا بهش 9 داده؟ جای از ریویو مجله اسکن نیست؟
از الان میگم اگه GamesRadar به این بازی امتیاز 5 از 10 داد اصلا تعجب نکنید! چون معلوم الحال بودنش کاملا برای من یه نفر ثابت شده
Originally Posted by Evilninja:
I'll bite.As one of the writers of the GamesRadar piece you guys are mocking, I have to ask: what exactly is your beef with it? Not to be defensive, but you guys seem to be dogpiling on and calling it shit without giving any reasons why it's shit. Seriously, I want to know. If nobody tells us what we're doing wrong, then we're doomed to keep doing it.
(1) We already told you what you were doing wrong the first 5 times you started doing it.
THIS time, it's sort of the pinnacle of everything wrong with your site's coverage of this specific game. There's no use even responding to why the article in question is so juvenile.
It's intentional fanboy baiting and trolling from a prominent online publication. If I'm reading a Killzone 2 article, I don't want to hear the perspective of a Gears of War fanboy stating the exact opposite of what you're saying. It serves no purpose. And I fully realize you have done this before with games like Halo 3 and Gears of War.
(2) Just to list the double standard in coverage GamesRadar has given Killzone 2 compared to other major shooter titles, have a look at the following 'preview' article titles for the following games.
Gears of War 2:
Gears of War 2: Most Improved Sequel Ever?
10 Things We Already Love About Gears of War 2
Gears of War 2's Biggest Surprises: We've finished the game. Here's 16 things that blew us away...
Halo 3:
Halo 3 - The Fanboy's Verdict: 5 reasons why Halo 3 is going to crush old Halo multiplayer
E3 07: Halo 3
We begin the single player campaign and describe every second of the epic experience
Now, compare this with some of the coverage KILLZONE 2 has received from your site leading up to release. It is an absolute EMBARRASSMENT.
LGC 08: Why wait? Leipzig's biggest games reviewed NOW!
Knee-jerk reviews after ten minutes' play-time. As is only right and proper
^ In this article you 'reviewed' Killzone 2 at GC and gave it a ****ing 5.
Here, look at the quote:
Beautiful graphics and fairly decent multiplayer level design mean nothing in an FPS which during our hands-on took up to a week to respond to control inputs and masked the action with a layer of post-processed vaseline at every opportunity. Sluggish, terrible to control, and seemingly on a steadfast mission to confuse the player.![]()
Stabbing through Killzone 2
Seemingly suicidal gameplay tactic reveals Helghast are DUMBER than they look
Killzone 2: What the reviews will say
^ An 'anti-hype' preview review. Ahhh. Nice one. An article that tries to set the 'tone' for future reviews, hoping to notch down the credibility of KZ2's first 5/5 score. BRILLIANT! GamesRadar again!
E3 08: Why wait? E3's biggest games reviewed NOW
OH, HEY! Another 'Review' from GamesRadar based on 10 minutes of hands on play.
Gears of War 2 Score: 10
Killzone 2 Score: 6This sequel doesn't just stick with the successes of the first game - it supersizes them. The enemies are scarier, with Locust armies swarming the screen, some of them skyscraper-sized. The world is grittier, with entire cities in danger of utter destruction. The multiplayer is crazier, with never ending modes like Horde. Most importantly, the gore is, well, gorier. Who can say no to bloody chainsaw duels, rotting meat shields and torque bow decapitations? Bigger, better and more badass indeed.
Killzone 2: The world's most generic game characterFinally, a PS3 game worthy of the "Killzone" name! Just be glad the name isn't "Resistance" or "Gears of War", because then this would totally fall short. It's boring, from the all-gray graphics to the level design (hey, another warehouse!) to the set pieces, which involve such exciting things as blowing up a small bridge or opening a very large door with a hand crank. Yes, it's chaotic like a real war zone, but being a poor man's Call of Duty just isn't going to cut it.
^ This one speaks for itself.![]()
Your coverage of Killzone 2 has been absolutely disgusting. I'm not talking about YOU in particular as one single editor -- but collectively. And yes, you most certainly (YOU, meaning GamesRadar in general) have hated on Killzone 2 and thought it was going to be 'shit', especially with the asinine 'preview' reviews that you've given the game in the past with 5's, 6's, and now 8's.We don’t hate Killzone 2. I actually just spent this entire article talking about what Killzone 2 does better than three other successful shooters. How is that hate? Yes, I had other guys debate me about it, but that’s because we think there’s reader benefit in the resulting conversation.
For the record, I don't think we'll be eating crow over this anytime in the future, because - and I understand why this might be a shared misconception if you don't actually read GamesRadar on even an occasional basis - GamesRadar does not hate Killzone 2, or think that Killzone 2 is going to be shit. I finished playing it last night, and I think it's amazing, and I have every confidence that its harshest skeptics and critics will have a change of heart once they play it (assuming they bother to actually play it, anyway).
The guys who argue against me also liked it, but I specifically asked them to be as antagonistic as possible, because I personally find that a hell of a lot more entertaining than a couple of people mumbling half-hearted agreements at each other and regurgitating the same information you can find everywhere else. We’re all playing roles, though I suppose that’s not obvious if you’re not a regular reader of our site and don’t listen to our podcast.
If you came away with the impression that the article, or GamesRadar for that matter, was somehow anti-Killzone 2, then that's regrettable. We’re not. And we’ll thank you for offering specific tips on how we can communicate our message better in the future, because the tone of this thread makes clear that we didn’t get our point across this time.
نظر شما، بنده و همه بازی دوستان قابل احترامه و توهین به هیچ سلیقه ای نباید بشه. خود من سایت GiantBomb رو خیلی دوست دارم اما همین سایت وقتی به MK vs DC میده 5 از 5 ولی به Left 4 Dead میده 4 از 5...كلا هر سايتي كه براي بعضي از بازيهاي محبوب كم لطف باشه ميشه درپيت .
هر جور كه راحت هستيد, ولي اين سايت حداقل از نظر من جزو بهترين هاست و خيلي بهتر از سايتهاي ديگه عمل ميكنه . هرچند حتي ممكنه بر خلاف نظر بعضي ها اين سايت به همين killzone2 نمره بالاتر از 9 هم بده ! كه اونوقت ديگه بعد اون از اعتبارش خبر ندارم ؟!