امتیازات Crysis 3

Behrooz

کاربر سایت

mv0en9v66335qtb6umxg.jpg

شماره‌ی جدید مجله‌ی لهستانی CD-Action حاوی اولین Reviewی Crysis 3 بود. در یک نقد 8 صفحه‌ای مجله به بازی نمره‌ی 9 رو اعطا کرد.

جزییات از نقد:

Gameplay 9/10
Video 10/10
Audio 8/10
Overall 9/10

interesting info:
-it takes 5h to complete game in normal mode with sidemissions

-don't skip the credits sth. cool about it or after it
-probably driveble tank
-ending doesn't exclude future dlc
-last two levels are really big
-facial animations better done than in LA Noire

-This is not only Crytek's best work and the most beautiful PC title to date but also a wonderful good-bye to the current generation of platforms. Crysis finally found its place among Call of Duty, Battlefield and Halo, taking some of their best bits but at the same time
remaining distinct enough to be worth your time. You should definitely at least see it. - CD-Action 03/2013, p.44
Crysis 3 Critic Reviews for PC - Metacritic



Gamereactor.dk - 8/10
Gamerfuzion.com - 9/10
nydailynews.com - 5/5
Polygon - 7/10
Eurogamer - 7/10
IGN - 8.5
Edge - 6/10
CVG - 8.5
Destructoid - 7.5
Kotaku - NO
Gamespy - 4/5
GameInformer - 8.5
Gametrailers - 9.0
Gamespot - 7.5
GameStar - 9.2/10
PC Games (Germany) - 9.1/10
PC Gamer - 8.1/10
Multiplayer.it - 9/10
IGN Italia - 8.5/10
GamesBeat - 8.5/10
Official Xbox Magazine - 8.5/10
Digital Spy - 8/10
Joystiq - 8/10
GamesRadar - 7/10
VideoGamer - 6/10
OPM UK - 8/10



Quote:
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: quotearea"] GameInformer - 8.5
Crysis 3’s evolutionary enhancements don’t move the needle for the series very far, but the core nanosuit-based gameplay is still thrilling. If you have a rig that can run the PC version of Crysis 3, I strongly recommend you go this route. The high-resolution textures, realistic lighting, and detailed facial animations gives you a taste of the graphical fidelity we expect to be standard in next-generation consoles.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Quote:
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: quotearea"] Gamespy - 4/5
Crysis 3 is a self-assured but largely unambitious game, content to refine the experience of the previous games in the series without deviating very far from the standard that they set. It takes itself a bit more seriously than its plot probably warrants, sure, and it willfully throws out references to games that are far more memorable than it ultimately winds up being, but to its credit, it seems quite comfortable to focus on execution rather than the revolution that the first Crysis shot for. Considering that it delivers a fun, polished experience, it's hard to fault it for that.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Quote:
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: quotearea"] Kotaku - NO
Lovely graphics aside, Crysis 3 is a mostly mediocre shooter in which fancy visuals faintly disguise haphazard design and a lack of technical polish.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Quote:
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: quotearea"] Destructoid - 7.5
Crysis 3 attempts to strike a balance between Crysis and Crysis 2, but in doing so manages to lose a little bit of what made each game appealing. The result is a title that doesn't truly match the open-ended excitement of the first game nor the revelatory empowerment of the second, yet manages to provide enough of both to at least tantalize, even if it doesn't completely satisfy. Solo play is shorter than previous installments and not as enjoyable, but multiplayer goes some way toward apologizing for it by stepping up its game and providing a gripping new experience in Hunter mode. This is a game that feels like the very essence of a "third installment" -- Familiar to the point of looking overplayed, but nonetheless refined and suffering no lack of quality.

And hell, even if it does feel a touch too powerful, that big damn bow is hard not to love.
Read more at http://www.destructoid.com/review-cr...fRMEFu6K18X.99
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Quote:
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: quotearea"] Polygon - 7/10 (aegis is the author)
Crysis 3 has a strong foundation, but never seems to ask for much from the player
That might be the thing that stands out the most to me about my time with Crysis 3. I enjoyed myself despite how much of a step backward the entire game feels from its predecessors. It's a beautiful game with jaw-dropping production values. But it took me a few hours to realize how empty Crysis 3 feels. The best thing I can manage to say about it is this: It didn't get in my way. But I would have had more fun if Crysis 3 had put up a fight.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Quote:
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: quotearea"] IGN - 8.5
Crysis 3 is a polished iteration on the previous Crysis titles. Its campaign mode features some much needed soul beneath the sci-fi sheen, which gives a sense of purpose to all the killing that has been previously absent from the series. While its multiplayer mode isn’t quite strong enough to tear you away from the genre leaders for long, it at least provides enough of its own flavour to present a worthy alternative.

It’s not quite a next generation experience come early, but it’s a superbly controlled, tightly paced and tactically flexible shooter with a satisfyingly focussed story, and an excellent way to tie up the Crysis series... for now.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


 
آخرین ویرایش:
مگه همه چی گرافیکه ؟!!! بازی نقد میکنن ، فیلم انیمیشن که نیست !

شما مثل اینکه داری با گیمر تازه کار صحبت میکنی.

معلومه قرار نیست انیمیشن نقد کنن.

ولی بنظر شما گیم پلی بازی یا داستانش این قدر فاجعه وار بود که بدنش 6؟

اگر قراره گرافیک اینقدر کم در نظر گرفته بشه چه احتیاجی به نسل عوض شدن هست؟
 
شما مثل اینکه داری با گیمر تازه کار صحبت میکنی.

معلومه قرار نیست انیمیشن نقد کنن.

ولی بنظر شما گیم پلی بازی یا داستانش این قدر فاجعه وار بود که بدنش 6؟

اگه فاجعه بود 3 - 4 میدادن ! الانم میانگینش احتمالا همون 7 و خورده ای یا 8 میشه که یعنی خوبه ... من خودم تازه اولشم ، درسته گرافیکش حتی روی کنسول هم بی نظیره ولی تا اینجا گیم پلی بازی یه حالت سردرگم داشته واسم و زیاد هم بالانس نیست .... صمن اینکه دیگه آخر نسلی یه بازی باید خیلی عالی باشه که امتیازهای خیلی بالا بگیره .
 
من به همه پیشنهاد میدم بگیریتش!
این امتیازات به خاطر این هست که روز انتشار نقدها با انتشار بازی همزمانه! یعنی embargo رو شرکت ea لعنتی اینطوری تعیین کرده!!!!
 
شما مثل اینکه داری با گیمر تازه کار صحبت میکنی.

معلومه قرار نیست انیمیشن نقد کنن.

ولی بنظر شما گیم پلی بازی یا داستانش این قدر فاجعه وار بود که بدنش 6؟

اگر قراره گرافیک اینقدر کم در نظر گرفته بشه چه احتیاجی به نسل عوض شدن هست؟

البته کرایتک اونقدری که توی مبحث تکنولوژی رو به جلو حرکت میکنه توی گیم پلی از شماره ی اول تا وارهد و بعدش هم شماره ی 2 سیر نزولی داشته توی گیم پلیش، اینو قبلا هم گفته بودم .
شماره ی 3 رو هنوز بازی نکردم ولی توی ویدئو ها خیلی عالی به نظر میومد، من خودم خیلی مطمئن بودم به بازی، حالا این نمره ها عجیبه که به بازی دادن. باید خود آدم بازی کنه، نمره تقریبا یه چیز سلیقه ایه.
 
این همه ما گفتیم هوش مصنوعی بازی مشکل عمده داره و رو گیم پلی تاثیر منفی میزاره، این همه گفتیم گیم پلی بازی تعادل نداره، هی گفتن آره دارید ترول می کنید و فلان.
Remarkably easy, all the way to the end
AI is easily exploited
مشکلاتی که از Crysis 2 با این سری همراهه و هنوز هم حل نشده. من اصلا از متای بازی تعجب نمی کنم.
 
البته کرایتک اونقدری که توی مبحث تکنولوژی رو به جلو حرکت میکنه توی گیم پلی از شماره ی اول تا وارهد و بعدش هم شماره ی 2 سیر نزولی داشته توی گیم پلیش، اینو قبلا هم گفته بودم .
شماره ی 3 رو هنوز بازی نکردم ولی توی ویدئو ها خیلی عالی به نظر میومد، من خودم خیلی مطمئن بودم به بازی، حالا این نمره ها عجیبه که به بازی دادن. باید خود آدم بازی کنه، نمره تقریبا یه چیز سلیقه ایه.

بیشتر به مولتی پلیر و فیزیک ماشین ها گیر دادند و از داستان بازی و کارکتر های بازی هم تعریف شده و گیم پلی رو هم خیلیا نقطه قوت بازی دونستند!!! این برداشت من از خوندن نقدهای ign - gamespot- gt - gi - edge بود
 
کلام سایت‌های:d خودتون ترجمش کنید:
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: quotearea"] GameInformer
Crysis 3’s evolutionary enhancements don’t move the needle for the series very far, but the core nanosuit-based gameplay is still thrilling. If you have a rig that can run the PC version of Crysis 3, I strongly recommend you go this route. The high-resolution textures, realistic lighting, and detailed facial animations gives you a taste of the graphical fidelity we expect to be standard in next-generation consoles.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: quotearea"] Gamespy
Crysis 3 is a self-assured but largely unambitious game, content to refine the experience of the previous games in the series without deviating very far from the standard that they set. It takes itself a bit more seriously than its plot probably warrants, sure, and it willfully throws out references to games that are far more memorable than it ultimately winds up being, but to its credit, it seems quite comfortable to focus on execution rather than the revolution that the first Crysis shot for. Considering that it delivers a fun, polished experience, it's hard to fault it for that.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: quotearea"] Kotaku
Lovely graphics aside, Crysis 3 is a mostly mediocre shooter in which fancy visuals faintly disguise haphazard design and a lack of technical polish.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: quotearea"] Destructoid
Crysis 3 attempts to strike a balance between Crysis and Crysis 2, but in doing so manages to lose a little bit of what made each game appealing. The result is a title that doesn't truly match the open-ended excitement of the first game nor the revelatory empowerment of the second, yet manages to provide enough of both to at least tantalize, even if it doesn't completely satisfy. Solo play is shorter than previous installments and not as enjoyable, but multiplayer goes some way toward apologizing for it by stepping up its game and providing a gripping new experience in Hunter mode. This is a game that feels like the very essence of a "third installment" -- Familiar to the point of looking overplayed, but nonetheless refined and suffering no lack of quality.

And hell, even if it does feel a touch too powerful, that big damn bow is hard not to love.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: quotearea"] Polygon
Crysis 3 has a strong foundation, but never seems to ask for much from the player
That might be the thing that stands out the most to me about my time with Crysis 3. I enjoyed myself despite how much of a step backward the entire game feels from its predecessors. It's a beautiful game with jaw-dropping production values. But it took me a few hours to realize how empty Crysis 3 feels. The best thing I can manage to say about it is this: It didn't get in my way. But I would have had more fun if Crysis 3 had put up a fight.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

IGN
Crysis 3 is a polished iteration on the previous Crysis titles. Its campaign mode features some much needed soul beneath the sci-fi sheen, which gives a sense of purpose to all the killing that has been previously absent from the series. While its multiplayer mode isn’t quite strong enough to tear you away from the genre leaders for long, it at least provides enough of its own flavour to present a worthy alternative.

It’s not quite a next generation experience come early, but it’s a superbly controlled, tightly paced and tactically flexible shooter with a satisfyingly focussed story, and an excellent way to tie up the Crysis series... for now.
 
اگه فاجعه بود 3 - 4 میدادن ! الانم میانگینش احتمالا همون 7 و خورده ای یا 8 میشه که یعنی خوبه ... من خودم تازه اولشم ، درسته گرافیکش حتی روی کنسول هم بی نظیره ولی تا اینجا گیم پلی بازی یه حالت سردرگم داشته واسم و زیاد هم بالانس نیست .... صمن اینکه دیگه آخر نسلی یه بازی باید خیلی عالی باشه که امتیازهای خیلی بالا بگیره .

اقا منظور من زحمتیه که رو بازی میکشن

درسته گرافیک همه چی نیست ولی وقتی شما همچین گرافیک چشم نوازی رو میبینی رو کنسول که تا حالا 2 یا 3 تا شوتر بیشتر در این حد نبودن معلومه تیم خیلی زحمت کشیدن.
بلاخره هر تیم بازیسازی تو یکی از موارد قدرت خاصی داره.
مثلا دارکسایدر گرافیک نداشت ولی خلق گیم پلی به این صورت و معماگونه واقعا سخت و از عهده هر کسی بر نمیومد.

بحث سر اینه که قرار نیست هر گیمی هفت خط باشه و همه چیزش کامل باشه تا نمره بالا بگیره .مثالش هم کم نیست همین بردلند2 .

سایت اومده داده 6 یا 7 معلومه اصلا زحمتی که برای گرافیک بازی رو کشیدن رو این پلتفرمهای 7 سال پیش به پشم هم حساب نکرده.
 
بیشتر به مولتی پلیر و فیزیک ماشین ها گیر دادند و از داستان بازی و کارکتر های بازی هم تعریف شده و گیم پلی رو هم خیلیا نقطه قوت بازی دونستند!!! این برداشت من از خوندن نقدهای ign - gamespot- gt - gi - edge بود

مولتی به کنار، ولی همون طور که دوستمون اشاره کردن AI بازی توی نسخه ی 2 مشکل داشت و کلا مبارزاتش خیلی challenge نمیداد که یکی از مهمترین قسمت های یه بازیه شوتر هست که باید توی این نسخه حلش میکردن، ولی کلکسیون سلاح های این نسخه رو واقعا خوب کار کرده بودن.
 

کاربرانی که این گفتگو را مشاهده می‌کنند

تبلیغات متنی

Top
رمز عبور خود را فراموش کرده اید؟
اگر میخواهی عضوی از بازی سنتر باشی همین حالا ثبت نام کن
or