Movie Center

SiminSecret · Sep 24, 2005

And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy My brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay My vengeance upon you

فهرست سایت ها و ربات های دانلود فیلم و سریال که بدون سانسور هستن (آپدیت شده در تاریخ 9 آذر 1404):

Seser.pesar · Oct 9, 2013

یکی به من یه فیلم کمدی قشنگ و به شدت صحن..ه دار معرفی کنه !

مثل امریکن پای

سریع بگید شب بزارم واسه دانلود
ممنون

Kavigne · Oct 9, 2013

نوشته شده توسط Seser.pesar:
یکی به من یه فیلم کمدی قشنگ و به شدت صحن..ه دار معرفی کنه !
مثل امریکن پای

سریع بگید شب بزارم واسه دانلود
ممنون

غریضه اصلی
اوریجینال سین
کرش (دیوید کروننبرگ)
آخرین تانگو در پاریس

T1SHTΛЯ · Oct 9, 2013

یکی به من یه فیلم کمدی قشنگ و به شدت صحن..ه دار معرفی کنه ! :biggrin1:
مثل امریکن پای

غریضه اصلی
اوریجینال سین
کرش (دیوید کروننبرگ)
آخرین تانگو در پاریس

آخرین تانگو، هنوزم درباره اش بحثه، کلی فلسفه ازش در اومده!
کرش هم یه جور دیگه فلسفیه!
اصلاً اینجور فیلما سبکشون فلسفیه:d کمدی نیستن.

Seser.pesar · Oct 9, 2013

نوشته شده توسط Lavigne:
غریضه اصلی
اوریجینال سین
کرش (دیوید کروننبرگ)
آخرین تانگو در پاریس

داداش دمت گرم ولی فلسفه رو اعصاب منه

یه ۴ تا خاک بر سری کمدی معرفی کن

دمت گرم

Kavigne · Oct 9, 2013

اینا اون قسمت خاک برسری رو ارضا میکنه دیگه! واسه کمدی هم Hangover وTropic Thunder ببین. یکم از این کمدیا ببین، بعد بیار رو صحنه های اونایی که گفتم، اینجوری دوتا کار رو باهم انجام دادی. هم فیلم مورد دار دیدی، هم کمدی...

Justiciar · Oct 9, 2013

نوشته شده توسط Seser.pesar:
داداش دمت گرم ولی فلسفه رو اعصاب منه
یه ۴ تا خاک بر سری کمدی معرفی کن
دمت گرم

Horrible Bosses
Friends With Benefits
No Strings Attached
Crazy, Stupid Love ( البته بیشتر Dirty Joke ـه )
Love and Other Drugs

END_BOY · Oct 9, 2013

نوشته شده توسط Seser.pesar:
یکی به من یه فیلم کمدی قشنگ و به شدت صحن..ه دار معرفی کنه !
مثل امریکن پای

سریع بگید شب بزارم واسه دانلود
ممنون

EuroTrip عین امریکن پای هست :d
Dukes of Hazzard هم همینطور :d

SaDrA-HhH · Oct 9, 2013

شما که انقد رو صحنه تاکید داری چرا به محصولات bra,zzers و ... مراجعه نمیکنی؟ :-/

AM!R · Oct 9, 2013

نوشته شده توسط SΛDrA-HhH:
شما که انقد رو صحنه تاکید داری چرا به محصولات bra,zzers و ... مراجعه نمیکنی؟

میخواد کمدی هم باشه آخه ، اونا که همه اکشن هستند

SaDrA-HhH · Oct 10, 2013

نوشته شده توسط AM!R-92:
میخواد کمدی هم باشه آخه ، اونا که همه اکشن هستند

کمدی هم داره،کلا تو اون زمینه از ملودرام دهه 40-50 بگیر تا اکشن و ترسناک و فلسفی فیلم هست

ghost · Oct 10, 2013

بندیکت کامبربچ در حین فیلمبرداری Fifth Estate میخواسته جولیان آسانژ رو ببینه. ولی آسانژ حاضر به ملاقاتش نشده.
حالا که فیلم تو جشنواره ها اکران شده و در شرف اکران عمومی هست آسانژ نامه اش به کامبربچ رو منتشر کرده که چرا حاضر به ملاقاتش نشده و چرا به نظرش کامبربچ فقط تبدیل به یه وسیله برا خاک کردن حقیقت شده :

Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013
From: Julian Assange
To: Benedict Cumberbatch
Subject: Message from Assange

Dear Benedict,

Thank you for trying to contact me. It is the first approach by anyone from the Dreamworks production to me or WikiLeaks.

My assistants communicated your request to me, and I have given it a lot of thought and examined your previous work, which I am fond of.

I think I would enjoy meeting you.

The bond that develops between an actor and a living subject is significant.

If the film reaches distribution we will forever be correlated in the public imagination. Our paths will be forever entwined. Each of us will be granted standing to comment on the other for many years to come and others will compare our characters and trajectories.

But I must speak directly.

I hope that you will take such directness as a mark of respect, and not as an unkindness.

I believe you are a good person, but I do not believe that this film is a good film.

I do not believe it is going to be positive for me or the people I care about.

I believe that it is going to be overwhelmingly negative for me and the people I care about.

It is based on a deceitful book by someone who has a vendetta against me and my organisation.

In other circumstances this vendetta may have gone away, but our conflict with the United States government and the establishment press has created a patronage and commissioning market – powerful, if unpopular – for works and comments that are harmful to us.

There are dozens of positive books about WikiLeaks, but Dreamworks decided to base its script only on the most toxic. So toxic is the first book selected by Dreamworks that it is distributed to US military bases as a mechanism to discourage military personnel from communicating with us. Its author is publicly known to be involved in the Dreamworks production in an ongoing capacity.

Dreamworks' second rights purchase is the next most toxic, biased book. Published and written by people we have had a bitter contractual dispute with for years, whose hostility is well known. Neither of these two books were the first to be published and there are many independent authors who have written positive or neutral books, all of whom Dreamworks ignored.

Dreamworks has based its entire production on the two most discredited books on the market.

I know the film intends to depict me and my work in a negative light.

I believe it will distort events and subtract from public understanding.

It does not seek to simplify, clarify or distil the truth, but rather it seeks to bury it.

It will resurrect and amplify defamatory stories which were long ago shown to be false.

---

My organisation and I are the targets of political adversary from the United States government and its closest allies.

The United States government has engaged almost every instrument of its justice and intelligence system to pursue—in its own words—a ‘whole of government’ investigation of ‘unprecedented scale and nature’ into WikiLeaks under draconian espionage laws. Our alleged sources are facing their entire lives in the US prison system. Two are already in it. Another one is detained in Sweden.

Feature films are the most powerful and insidious shapers of public perception, because they fly under the radar of conscious exclusion.

This film is going to bury good people doing good work, at exactly the time that the state is coming down on their heads.

It is going to smother the truthful version of events, at a time when the truth is most in demand.

As justification it will claim to be fiction, but it is not fiction. It is distorted truth about living people doing battle with titanic opponents. It is a work of political opportunism, influence, revenge and, above all, cowardice.

It seeks to ride on the back of our work, our reputation and our struggles.

It seeks to cut our strength with weakness. To cut affection with exploitation. To cut diligence with paranoia. To cut loyalty with naivety. To cut principle with hypocrisy. And above all, to cut the truth with lies.

The film's many distortions buttress what the prosecution will argue. Has argued. Is arguing. In my case, and in that of others. These cases will continue for years.

The studio that is producing the film is not a vulnerable or weak party.

Dreamworks' free speech rights are not in jeopardy – ours are.

Dreamworks is an extremely wealthy organisation, with ties to powerful interests in the US government.

I must therefore question the choices and motives behind it: the opportunism, fears and mundanity; the unwritten rules of film financing and distribution in the United States; the cringe against doing something useful and brave.

I believe that you are a decent person, who would not naturally wish to harm good people in dire situations.

---

You will be used, as a hired gun, to assume the appearance of the truth in order to assassinate it. To present me as someone morally compromised and to place me in a falsified history. To create a work, not of fiction, but of debased truth.

Not because you want to, of course you don't, but because, in the end, you are a jobbing actor who gets paid to follow the script, no matter how debauched.

Your skills play into the hands of people who are out to remove me and WikiLeaks from the world.

I believe that you should reconsider your involvement in this enterprise.

Consider the consequences of your cooperation with a project that vilifies and marginalises a living political refugee to the benefit of an entrenched, corrupt and dangerous state.

Consider the consequences to people who may fall into harm because of this film.

Many will fight against history being blackwashed in this way. It is a collective history now, involving millions of people, because millions have opened their eyes as a result of our work and the attempts to destroy us.

I believe you are well intentioned but surely you can see why it is a bad idea for me to meet with you.

By meeting with you, I would validate this wretched film, and endorse the talented, but debauched, performance that the script will force you to give.

I cannot permit this film any claim to authenticity or truthfulness. In its current form it has neither, and doing so would only further aid the campaign against me.

It is contrary to my interests, and to those of my organisation, and I thank you for your offer, and what I am sure is your genuine intent, but I must, with inexpressible regret, turn it down.

Julian Assange

Farh@d · Oct 10, 2013

نوشته شده توسط Seser.pesar:
یکی به من یه فیلم کمدی قشنگ و به شدت صحن..ه دار معرفی کنه !
مثل امریکن پای

سریع بگید شب واسه دانلود
ممنون

اگر با فیلم های کره ای حال می‌کنی:

Frozen flowers (این فیلم از نظر داستانی بی نطیره. سوای اسین هایی که داره)
Untold Scandal
The Servant 2010
The Concubine 2012

Red Dev!ls · Oct 10, 2013

نوشته شده توسط ghost:
بندیکت کامبربچ در حین فیلمبرداری Fifth Estate میخواسته جولیان آسانژ رو ببینه. ولی آسانژ حاضر به ملاقاتش نشده.
حالا که فیلم تو جشنواره ها اکران شده و در شرف اکران عمومی هست آسانژ یه نامه به کامبربچ نوشته که چرا حاضر به ملاقاتش نشده و چرا به نظرش کامبربچ فقط تبدیل به یه وسیله برا خاک کردن حقیقت شده :

Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013
From: Julian Assange
To: Benedict Cumberbatch
Subject: Message from Assange

Dear Benedict,

Thank you for trying to contact me. It is the first approach by anyone from the Dreamworks production to me or WikiLeaks.

My assistants communicated your request to me, and I have given it a lot of thought and examined your previous work, which I am fond of.

I think I would enjoy meeting you.

The bond that develops between an actor and a living subject is significant.

If the film reaches distribution we will forever be correlated in the public imagination. Our paths will be forever entwined. Each of us will be granted standing to comment on the other for many years to come and others will compare our characters and trajectories.

But I must speak directly.

I hope that you will take such directness as a mark of respect, and not as an unkindness.

I believe you are a good person, but I do not believe that this film is a good film.

I do not believe it is going to be positive for me or the people I care about.

I believe that it is going to be overwhelmingly negative for me and the people I care about.

It is based on a deceitful book by someone who has a vendetta against me and my organisation.

In other circumstances this vendetta may have gone away, but our conflict with the United States government and the establishment press has created a patronage and commissioning market – powerful, if unpopular – for works and comments that are harmful to us.

There are dozens of positive books about WikiLeaks, but Dreamworks decided to base its script only on the most toxic. So toxic is the first book selected by Dreamworks that it is distributed to US military bases as a mechanism to discourage military personnel from communicating with us. Its author is publicly known to be involved in the Dreamworks production in an ongoing capacity.

Dreamworks' second rights purchase is the next most toxic, biased book. Published and written by people we have had a bitter contractual dispute with for years, whose hostility is well known. Neither of these two books were the first to be published and there are many independent authors who have written positive or neutral books, all of whom Dreamworks ignored.

Dreamworks has based its entire production on the two most discredited books on the market.

I know the film intends to depict me and my work in a negative light.

I believe it will distort events and subtract from public understanding.

It does not seek to simplify, clarify or distil the truth, but rather it seeks to bury it.

It will resurrect and amplify defamatory stories which were long ago shown to be false.

---

My organisation and I are the targets of political adversary from the United States government and its closest allies.

The United States government has engaged almost every instrument of its justice and intelligence system to pursue—in its own words—a ‘whole of government’ investigation of ‘unprecedented scale and nature’ into WikiLeaks under draconian espionage laws. Our alleged sources are facing their entire lives in the US prison system. Two are already in it. Another one is detained in Sweden.

Feature films are the most powerful and insidious shapers of public perception, because they fly under the radar of conscious exclusion.

This film is going to bury good people doing good work, at exactly the time that the state is coming down on their heads.

It is going to smother the truthful version of events, at a time when the truth is most in demand.

As justification it will claim to be fiction, but it is not fiction. It is distorted truth about living people doing battle with titanic opponents. It is a work of political opportunism, influence, revenge and, above all, cowardice.

It seeks to ride on the back of our work, our reputation and our struggles.

It seeks to cut our strength with weakness. To cut affection with exploitation. To cut diligence with paranoia. To cut loyalty with naivety. To cut principle with hypocrisy. And above all, to cut the truth with lies.

The film's many distortions buttress what the prosecution will argue. Has argued. Is arguing. In my case, and in that of others. These cases will continue for years.

The studio that is producing the film is not a vulnerable or weak party.

Dreamworks' free speech rights are not in jeopardy – ours are.

Dreamworks is an extremely wealthy organisation, with ties to powerful interests in the US government.

I must therefore question the choices and motives behind it: the opportunism, fears and mundanity; the unwritten rules of film financing and distribution in the United States; the cringe against doing something useful and brave.

I believe that you are a decent person, who would not naturally wish to harm good people in dire situations.

---

You will be used, as a hired gun, to assume the appearance of the truth in order to assassinate it. To present me as someone morally compromised and to place me in a falsified history. To create a work, not of fiction, but of debased truth.

Not because you want to, of course you don't, but because, in the end, you are a jobbing actor who gets paid to follow the script, no matter how debauched.

Your skills play into the hands of people who are out to remove me and WikiLeaks from the world.

I believe that you should reconsider your involvement in this enterprise.

Consider the consequences of your cooperation with a project that vilifies and marginalises a living political refugee to the benefit of an entrenched, corrupt and dangerous state.

Consider the consequences to people who may fall into harm because of this film.

Many will fight against history being blackwashed in this way. It is a collective history now, involving millions of people, because millions have opened their eyes as a result of our work and the attempts to destroy us.

I believe you are well intentioned but surely you can see why it is a bad idea for me to meet with you.

By meeting with you, I would validate this wretched film, and endorse the talented, but debauched, performance that the script will force you to give.

I cannot permit this film any claim to authenticity or truthfulness. In its current form it has neither, and doing so would only further aid the campaign against me.

It is contrary to my interests, and to those of my organisation, and I thank you for your offer, and what I am sure is your genuine intent, but I must, with inexpressible regret, turn it down.

Julian Assange

یه توضیح کوتاه بدی پویا ممنون میشم . متن رو خوندم ولی خب باز کلیت موضوع رو نمیدونم .

Cloud Strife · Oct 10, 2013

نوشته شده توسط Seser.pesar:
یکی به من یه فیلم کمدی قشنگ و به شدت صحن..ه دار معرفی کنه !
مثل امریکن پای

سریع بگید شب بزارم واسه دانلود
ممنون

این دوتا رو ببین:

Cream Pie MILF
Kelly Trump in Dream of Creamy Gen*ie

فقط میزان خنده دار بودنشون به حس شوخ طبعی خودت وابستس.

SaDrA-HhH · Oct 10, 2013

نوشته شده توسط Cloud Strife:
این دوتا رو ببین:

Cream Pie MILF
Kelly Trump in Dream of Creamy Gen*ie

فقط میزان خنده دار بودنشون به حس شوخ طبعی خودت وابستس.

من میدونی آدم شوخ طبعیم ولی اولی اصلا خنده دار نبود

جستجو

Movie Center

گزینه‌های بیشتر

SiminSecret

Seser.pesar

Kavigne

T1SHTΛЯ

Seser.pesar

Kavigne

Justiciar

END_BOY

Tonight Is The Night

SaDrA-HhH

AM!R

SaDrA-HhH

ghost

Farh@d

There is no description of the situation

Red Dev!ls

Cloud Strife

SaDrA-HhH

کاربرانی که این گفتگو را مشاهده می‌کنند